Sorry, I’ve dated crazy women before and it worked out poorly. I really do appreciate the compliment though.

How did I deliberately omit somebody from something I didn’t even make?

So I take it you’ve read Rockwell, and are prepared to give a thorough refutation of his works?

I just made this a featured comment. It really brightened my holiday spirits!

The left can’t meme.

I stopped listening to these kikes by Tuesday. I’m prepared for that possibility.

Alright, I tried. Goodbye faggot.

Listen to the show if you’re going to comment. I was going to ban you but you’ve been around awhile so you’re getting a warning.

You don’t ask questions, you just spout off at the mouth like an uninformed idiot.

How is it even possible that you are still commenting here? It’s like you’ve never listened to an episode of the show.

http://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/angrif03.htm

You disprove that statement every time you make such utterances

You would be a more effective communicator of your ideas if you stopped pretending to know what libertarians understand

Thanks, just fixed it.

How many federal law enforcement agencies do you guys think this communist subversive has called trying to get me prosecuted for a hate crime?

And you try to “remove” me, it will be the last thing you do. I hope you fuckin try it.

I walked away from the LP years ago, faggot. Nobody removed me.

She informed me a couple of days ago that she still listens to my show religiously. She’s only doing this now because I mentioned pursuit of a romantic interest in episode 285 and she got jealous.

Thanks for showing future potential lovers of yours that you dispute none of the facts here, and are instead only lashing out emotionally at the people who exposed your horrible behavior. I’m certain your potential employers will be interested too, and you’re going to be needing a lot of employers when your money runs out and your incapacity to maintain a single relationship leads to you getting fired every three months.

And don’t bother deleting the comments, I’ve already taken screenshots.

Last I checked neither of us had murdered any babies. Not that I’m holding that against against you at this point. Death is surely preferable to being your son or daughter, it was the merciful thing to do.

I’m so glad you’ve finally decided to respond to this post, and this is what you’ve come up with. I think it says a great deal about who you are, and what is being said about you.

I sent you an email, I look forward to speaking with you privately.

I left you a voicemail before she came back in January, you could have saved me a whole lotta trouble by returning my call.

The option to do so is obviously here.

I think I’d like it if you stopped reading/listening to me.

Maybe you should fuck off

I’m 36. If you think I need to be single until I’m 41, then forgive me if I don’t take you seriously as I contemplate input on my priorities.

No. A private road owner would not allow drunk drivers. He might have more reasonable rules and penalties, but the old “pro drunk driving” Chris is dead with the flag burner.

Because fuck your Uncle. That’s why.

As for liberals producing fewer children than conservatives, I’m not certain this is true. Yes, liberals have a tendency towards anti breeding behavior like birth control, abortion, and homosexuality. But firstly, this would not be something their evolutionary psychology had yet adapted to. They are simply avoiding consequences for their promiscuous behavior, as liberals and r-selected types are known to do. Still, when one takes into account the unrestrained and even subsidized breeding of welfare dependent individuals, single motherhood, etc… I suspect their breeding out numbers that of resource restrained conservatives.

Even if it doesn’t, they have done everything in their power to shape the environment to favor r-selective traits, thus, they multiply regardless of their own individual breeding habits by triggering epigenetic responses from those born by k-selected parents into an r-selected environment.

You should read before you comment, you ignorant fuck.

Shut up nigger, we’re trying to make America great again over here.

Hi retard. This blog has over 15,000 comments posted on it an a lot of them are negative. The one thing I don’t allow is spamming other websites in the comments. Maybe you should fuck your mother and then hang yourself like a good little boy?

Sorry about that, fixed it.

I figured he might do that. So I downloaded it and reuploaded it to this site. Good luck deleting that shit, stupid fuckin animal.

Nobody is going to prison, legal eagle. Not all of us live in commiefornia. Go kill yourself.

Can you raise the suicide rate for adults, please?

Destiny, please commit suicide.

Fuck you, “destiny” you’re a mentally ill male and I hope you commit suicide. If anybody wants to call this freak, his phone number is 803-979-1628

Fuck you. Nice rainbow, pussy. Stop spamming your stupid blog in the comments, it’s getting your remarks held for moderation.

First warning and only warning, the next time you make up lies, I’ll ban you from the comments here.

I never “made a move” on Josie, and I was never “assholish” about it. In fact, we were totally cool when she moved out of my house. So get your fucking facts straight or spew your bullshit somewhere else.

Thanks man, very thoughtful, and I look forward to you getting familiar.

Is it in some way unclear that I am responding to an attack on me with researched evidence?

When she was parroting Larken Rose on use of force I thought she was ideologically spot on. When she moved into the house I got to know her better, but by then it was difficult to think objectively.

Like I said bud, I was under the spell. It happens to the best of us.

The number for SGP is different than the number to contact me. The number listed here on the contact page is basically a voice mail that exists to record death threats. The SGP number is a different service to take calls to a podcast.

Much appreciated bud, both the dough, and the kind words!

What does that have to do with theft? If I make roads, does that mean I can steal?

I’m sick of listening to you complain about the comment policy that preceded your presence here, so now you can go bitch somewhere else.

You may have posted links here, but those comments got moderated, and they weren’t approved. I’m fine with getting negative publicity, I’m not fine with giving publicity to braindead idiots.

You allow links posted on your blog because links from your blog are valueless. I get inundated with stupid shit like this every day because people actually read this site on a regular basis, and I’m not here to promote your stupid ramblings. If you want to draw attention to yourself, do something worthwhile instead of link baiting people who matter.

To be clear, I had an author’s account on AVfM and manually submitted content to them for approval and publishing. They have not been pulling content from this site on their own.

Stay tuned here, I’ll be responding to the AVfM fiasco by tomorrow afternoon on this blog. You might not be seeing me appear at AVfM after this unfortunately.

I can understand their motivations, people who are trying to grow their popularity will often make a great deal of ideological concessions. But that kind of shit is what creates these messes in the first place, and I’m far more interested in striking the root than pandering to Clinton voters.

Classic misdirection. “Disagree with my position? You are a bigot who hates an entire gender for no other reason than their gender”. As I said to the cunt who started this mess, please kill yourself.

You may be my favorite commentator in the history of this blog. Please contact me either through the contact form on the site or via social media so I can message you privately.

Mike, your envy is showing…

Molyneux makes great content all the time, far better than you’ll ever produce. But then, I produce better content than you’ll ever produce, and you’re constantly talking shit about me too. I see a pattern developing.

The fact that you try to pretend his new stuff isn’t gold, shows that you’re nothing more than a jealous ass hater. You should be dismissed by any serious person, and in time, you will be.

Do the world a favor, and kill yourself.

Go fuck ya mudda!

Is that better? 🙂

Fuck “your” laws.

Knock at my door with violence and you’ll get shot, but feel free to swing by, kiddo.

Excellent point!

This may well be the greatest comment in the history of this blog. LOL

They are the ones calling themselves libertarians, I’m the one calling them out on their bullshit.

Is falsely implying BHL isn’t a leftist outfit you being a complete douche? Yes.

There’s a whole bunch of people there, and very little in the way of gun/weapons control in New Hampshire. Sans the doctrine of non-resistance this would probably be a story about a bully getting chased off.

Soon buddy, soon!

You don’t deserve to bear the name “John Galt” you should go switch your name to something more appropriate, like Wesley Mouch.

I’m not entirely sure that’s true either. People are dying and being kidnapped and tortured, if we want that to stop, something has to be done about it. I am not willing to accept the multigenerational path to failure.

No, and I tried to make that clear, sorry if I failed. I only meant to point out that I had to reevaluate my positions because I realized part of my world view was really fucked up.

I viewed men as having a certain proper role that made them frequent victims of violence. I’m being forced to reevaluate that. I have to take a second look at the positions I’ve stated after that world view is brought back into better focus.

I’m just a little bit concerned because a lot of people have read that distorted world view and I’d hate for them to act on it, only to have me realize I made a terrible mistake based on it.

Well fucking said, sir!

Your perception is not the issue, there are facts involved here. Your irrationality is a problem that needs addressing.

Holy crap, @disqus_3z69zSvvhR:disqus actually made a decent comment.

Some of you shy from the term left just because you know it has negative implications, its the same liberal horseshit we’ve been hearing from Democrats just marketed to libertarians.

I’m not failing to understand anything you dishonest liberal piece of shit. The fact that your ideas are incoherent and there’s no solid answer to anything makes it really convenient for scum like you to spread misinformation, but the fact of the matter is it makes perfect sense to lump left/thick together and you know it.

I’m sure you’ll go post this comment on all the anti gun posts that come from the liberal blogs next, right?

I write for A Voice For Men, the “Men’s Rights Movement” is not a conservative thing, we’ve got leftards writing on this too.

You remind me of this guy…

Lemme guess, Democrat? I’m sure you’ll go post this comment on all the anti gun posts that come from the liberal blogs next, right?

I wrote this entire article for the soul purpose of making that joke, glad somebody caught it 😉

Very astute observation and reference, I’m going to keep that one on hand for future arguments

If someone asks me to keep a communication confidential, I do it. If I did not, then people would have trouble speaking to me in confidence. The only reason I published what I did, was because them not distancing themselves from her publicly is evidence enough that they do not condemn her vicious remarks.

It’s not that unusual for anarchists to run for office, especially in New Hampshire, http://www.christophercantwell.com/2014/04/30/libertarian-party/

With dedicated readers like you, Right, how could I not gain an ego?

Go fuck your mother asshole. Bring forth my victim

If you came looking for a conservative Rand Paul cheerleader then you’re in the wrong place pal. But if you are looking for substance, I’ve got that. Check out this article on the subject http://www.christophercantwell.com/2014/03/05/diversityinlibertarianism/

Fairly unlikely that you would get ambushed by random strangers in a place where it’s legal for you to carry that handgun though, right?

Looks like your public schools are going real good out there too…

Fuck off leftard

That’s just plain incorrect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States_by_state

In this example it’s $100/month, that’s less than rent or food, or any number of other expenses in society today. It’s likely a lot less than your tax bill presently is, and if you rent an apartment it’s surely less than than the property taxes built into your rent. I really don’t see any reason for not having it except choice.

If you choose not to have it, well, that was your choice. I could go into a long list of things I think the accusing protection agency *should* do, but if you have nobody to protect you, then you’re on your own in this world and there ain’t a whole lot I can do to change that.

I too think imprisonment unlikely. Imprisonment is the most inefficient thing the State has come up with since warfare.

Here’s a piece at the Robert Woods Johnson foundation (Which is not only anti gun, but also has a bizarre neoprohibitionist attitude towards alcohol) About Ceasefire (now known as CureViolence) which specifically refers to “Gun Violence” http://www.rwjf.org/en/grants/grantees/cureviolence.html

Anybody who is talking about ending “gun violence” is talking about gun control.

Is it that difficult to the connect the dots? These people don’t oppose violence, they support government using violence in the ways they see fit. A bunch of anti gun social justice fanatics.

Of Project Orange Tree http://www.neighborhoodscribe.com/2013/03/youth-raise-alarm-on-violence-with-project-orange-tree/

Quote
“Gun violence is only one factor,” he said. “This is a very deep problem were are addressing. And different types of bills that
just deal with gun control are only band aide solutions.”

Unless those other issues are addressed *along with gun control*,
violence will persist, added Khepera, who also attends King and was good friends with Pendleton.
End Quote

They might have other initiatives and rhetoric, but they are anti gunners nonetheless

I really wish that were true. She’s been a contributor to Reason Magazine, she writes for Forbes, she’s been on Stossel. This woman has influence and it is gaining and it needs to be combated.

Believe it or not I haven’t read and listened to every bit of libertarian speech in the history of the world. 2+2=4 is a pretty common way of saying “This is a simple concept”

I think Rothbard acknowledges that it is impermissible to agress against the infant, he just thinks that leaving it to die in the snow doesn’t count as an aggression due to the failure to connect the dots of responsibility.

Well put.

Thanks Derrick!

I’ve made no NAP violations, I’ve espoused no bigotry. Liars and ignorant fucks like you are such a small and tedious minority that nobody would miss you if you left. The world would be a far better place in your absence.

Actually, if you had been paying even the slightest bit of attention, you would know that most of the people in the FSP agree with my premise. But of course, you’re not paying attention, you comment out of ignorance.

LOL, so I guess Nazi Germany, the US government that allowed slavery, the USSR, Communist China, North Korea, and pretty much every other statism in history is not enough evidence? How many times a day do you pray?

Please don’t call Noam Chomsky a libertarian…

Thanks bud!

Thanks for your brilliant intellectual input on the subject.

Shut up, whore. LOL

Joe,

All Bitcoin transactions are publicly visible on the blockchain. This has always been the design of Bitcoin, and it will be the design of any open source peer to peer currency of the future, since without a central authority to keep records, the records necessarily need to be held by the users of the system.

What Bitcoin does not do, is report these transactions to the IRS directly, they are not directly associated with your social security number or tax ID, and they cannot be seized by any authority without first capturing your private key. Those are the upsides, and there are lots of great reasons to use Bitcoin.

The only assertion this article makes is that it is not the savior of free market economics that some of the early adopters want to make it out to be. They are saying this because saying it drives up the demand and value of their assets.

The State uses defensive force? I always thought the State used initiatory force!

Your comment was too long after starting out with that kind of silliness for me to take seriously enough to read.

Oh, dude, you’re totally right. All this anarchy sucks. If only we had a government to help us right now.

Guess how much you’ll be missed?

If you’re still reading, please tell me how you feel about the following words,

Capitalism
Labor Union
Corporate Greed
Wage Slavery

Yup that’s me. Controlling everybody, putting people in cages, repeating pro government propaganda. Nice avatar, it suits you.

1. Libertarianism is a word coined to put a nicer spin on anarchism, voluntaryism was a word coined to put a nicer spin on libertarianism, they are all the same term.

2. A persons allegiance is first and foremost to their self preservation. Acting within the NAP is in your best interests if you actually study economics and think things through to their ultimate conclusion. While there may be a short term benefit to aggressing against others, you generally tend to make enemies when you do that, and it makes life extraordinarily dangerous.

3. I don’t want Chick Fill A or Duck Dynasty put out of business, I want these whiny liberal twats to shut the fuck up. There are no victims of discrimination, discrimination is a victimless crime. If I have access to goods and services, as I said in the article, it doesn’t matter if I deny you access to them because you’re a dishonest liberal snob or because I don’t like the color of your skin, it’s my decision to make. If somebody hates gay people, then your choices are to do business with them or not do business with them. You don’t get to decide whether or not other people do, and I don’t see why leftists find this so difficult to comprehend. Do you want freedom or not? Freedom includes people doing things that you don’t like.

4. When you say “free market coercion” you show your ignorance. It’s not that I can’t imagine a world free of trade, its that I don’t have any desire to. Trade is a good thing.

Austin, that’s what libertarianism is. If you must insist on being a statist, then that just makes you a half assed libertarian.

Your acceptance of the State is a far greater danger than any bacteria ever sneezed in a park. At least we all recognize ebola as a threat and can therefore do something to stop it when it makes itself known.

What can the State do to prevent disease? Send in the National Guard? Put guns in our faces? Last I checked, germs weren’t afraid of tanks and rifles.

If someone is a threat to your safety, you can do whatever is necessary to protect yourself from them under the NAP. If you see a sick person and you say “Stay the fuck away from me, leper” and they sneeze on you anyway, that’s assault.

If you don’t know that the person is sick, then the State can’t help you anymore than you can help yourself.

As for a quarantine, I don’t at all like the idea of a military forcing me to stay in the same place as sick people.

Shut up, cunt.

No, but seriously, your comment is ridiculous. You know very well what “equal pay for an equal day” means. So don’t be a dishonest gender baiting leftist.

“Cunt” doesn’t even begin to describe the uselessness of your comment, or you opinion in general.

Way to whine like a bitch on the internet. Now that I know you are insensitive to modern tyranny, you can go fuck your mother with a curling iron.

Thanks for the very informative feedback, Chris. I guess my thought process goes straight to smoking, and I don’t think I ever got through more than half an ounce in a day, and that was smoking regs with friends around.

The tax thing you mentioned is interesting, I’ll need to look into that more. I moderate comments containing links here, but if you post source information on the tax rates I’ll approve those comments and consider doing another article on that.

Enjoy fading into obscurity, and wondering when retaliation will find you.

You are exactly the type of slave I was talking about in the article, you are everything that his disgusting about the human race, and I strongly suggest getting in the tub with an electrical cord.

Actually, every available measurement shows that even without a Facebook account, I have a larger platform than Buehler, hence Buehler’s incessant cries of racism in effort to end the debate.

This website sees more traffic than all Buehler’s websites, and social media platforms combined.

I am not whining or “licking my wounds”. I’m trashing this scumbag’s reputation.

Well, something’s fucked up then. I tried that with two of the accounts, they say email not found.

I assure you it’s him, see the next article, I discussed it with him on video shortly after this happened.

Never go full retard.

I’ll donate $50 to the charity of Antonio’s choice for proof. I’m pretty sure this is complete bullshit.

Approved

LOL, I can censor anybody I want, Antonio. I just like to let you talk because it helps me collect evidence. For example, Antonio Buehler and Jane Aggies are the same person. 🙂

More lies, slander. Why am I not surprised?

Care to tell me where the racism and graphic violence is in this image?

Is this racist? Aside from exposing police brutality, do you see graphic violence here?

As you leftist snitches are surely aware, Facebook doesn’t tell us who made what reports. All we know is that false reports are made, and that your members openly discuss reporting inside your group.

You label someone as a racist, and then report everything they do whether it’s racist or not. That’s how LIBERALS operate.

But why would we expect an honest response from a guy who calls himself a libertarian and thinks “bigotry” and “wage slavery” should be the primary focus of libertarianism…

George, you almost had me ready to take back my statement, until you said that the call for snitches was satirical. We both know that’s a lie, so the rest of your statement is called into question.

If you blocked Antonio, it was only after wholeheartedly supporting his efforts to slander me, just like you did when you called me a terrorist on your blog.

I was about to say, at the bottom of the donate page, but then I realized that’s where you were commenting. I see it there, have you tried refreshing the page? In any case, here’s the link, http://amzn.com/w/1NBLFAIY9HRQU

Thank you!

I am the man who recorded this video and pulled his gun. I think Robert is providing sound advice to gun owners with this post. I don’t in any way feel disrespected, and since I am a huge fan of this site, I’m quite honored that he featured my video.

I would point out that I’m not most gun owners. I part of a political migration to bring more liberty to the State of New Hampshire. I am a writer, political commentator, and videographer by trade. I carry a gun to work, in part because I realize things like this can happen. My colleagues here have been assaulted more than once, and I was not about to let myself become a victim.

If your job doesn’t require you to film lunatics at 3am, then you should not do so. If you are not part of a hated political minority, then maybe you shouldn’t be sitting on porches waiting for thieves.

But I am. So I did. And I don’t have the slightest shred of regret for any of it.

I am the man who recorded this video and pulled his gun. I think Robert is providing sound advice to gun owners with this post. I don’t in any way feel disrespected, and since I am a huge fan of this site, I’m quite honored that he featured my video.

I would point out that I’m not most gun owners. I part of a political migration to bring more liberty to the State of New Hampshire. I am a writer, political commentator, and videographer by trade. I carry a gun to work, in part because I realize things like this can happen. My colleagues here have been assaulted more than once, and I was not about to let myself become a victim.

If your job doesn’t require you to film lunatics at 3am, then you should not do so. If you are not part of a hated political minority, then maybe you shouldn’t be sitting on porches waiting for thieves.

But I am. So I did. And I don’t have the slightest shred of regret for any of it.

Let's get something straight, you're not part of the same movement as Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell, Stefan Molyneux, or myself. Stop trying to hijack it, and join the communist party, I'm fucking sick of this crap.

We understand it just fine. We don't appreciate Tucker cuddling up with leftists.

George Orwell warned us about this kind of doublespeak.

And the leftists think its cool for government agents to kill us.

Have you read the article you’re commenting on?

I’m not playing any “victim card” I left, as you said. Hardly a victim’s plea. I’m just pointing out that the article is putting false information out there by saying the leftists were dealt with. They clearly were not.

You obviously have no problem with violence if you don’t outright reject the legitimacy of the State. The State is violence incarnate.

That’s a contradiction of terms. A State is incapable of “serving”. A State exists to take by force, a thief cannot also be a servant.

Why do you keep going back to “left vs right”? I never made any “left vs. right” point. You’re purposely distracting from the issue, not that I’m surprised.

I’m not talking about “left vs. right” but there are leftists, Esmay for example.

“Left vs. Right” tends to imply “Hey, do you want to give up your economic liberty, or your personal liberty?” a stupid question, obviously. Nobody should be handing ANY authority over to the State. But the liberals will absolutely hand the government more authority at every turn, even as it favors women over men.

The leftists at AVfM were dealt with? When was that? I was a contributor here until I mixed it up with the liberals.

I wrote the different take the editor put in the footer. Definitely disagree with you here, although the point of it being a sexual assault by feminist standards is an astute observation. Amy is clearly not advocating in any of this that a guy be locked up just because a woman is drunk or has second thoughts after the fact, which is a lot more than we can say for folks like Laci Green and other full bore violent feminist radicals.

She may have started off blaming men for her self esteem issues, but what I thought was uplifting was the fact that she ultimately took responsibility for herself instead of blaming society or some imagined “patriarchy” for her problems.

As to her complaining about stuff, I think that has a lot more to do with being a comedian than anything, that’s sort of what we do for a living.

“The government screwed the young, therefore libertarians should be leftists”

I have rope, if you’d like to hang yourself.

As I sincerely hope you’re enjoying losing more influence by the day since I’ve exposed you as a complete fraud.

Wow, what a lying piece of shit.

If you want more women involved in IT, then stop bitching about it and get involved in IT. There’s no entry barrier, especially in open source. You just fucking do it. I am so sick of this radical leftist bent being taken seriously on libertarian websites. Why the hell did you idiots give her a microphone?

You are a talented writer, a wordsmith, a brilliant communicator, well informed, the truest of libertarians, and a fuckin funny guy to boot. Thank you for this!

No, to answer your question, listening to your podcast is a chore. It’s a lot easier to ask someone else to do that.

I’m pretty sure you losers are only linking to me for attention yourselves, get off Ben Stone’s cock.

Michele Loses all credibility when she calls herself a “Constitutional Conservative” while supporting the Patriot Act, if she wants a conservative president, then she should acknowledge her wrongdoing, bow out of the race, and endorse Ron Paul for President.

This pathetic display of begging for money is as ridiculous as her husbands pray away the gay clinic.

Maybe she should return all her farm subsidies, and the government money she took for raising all those kids she likes to brag about, if she is so pissed off about these “frugal socialists”

We’re lucky she doesn’t stand a chance.

Did you put any thought whatsoever into this hit piece? I hope not, because if this is what you come up with when you think, you’re mind is severely lacking.

I could run around smoking crack with Rachel Maddow for 6 months and do better.

Ron Paul has never written anything praising white supremacy, others wrote articles hinting at such things in a publication that carried his name, when it was brought to his attention, he stopped it, quickly.

If Ron Paul is a racist, why does he defend the “Ground Zero Mosque”?
If Ron Paul is a racist, why does he want us to stop killing brown people overseas?

Maybe its time for you to start paying attention to what a person says before you call them names.

I think the racists are the warmongering criminals who keep sending our men off to kill brown people who pray funny.

Nullification IS Constitutional, the whole point is to NULLIFY Unconstitutional laws. Where you maniacs get off calling it constitutional hypocrisy or racism is beyond my comprehension.

We’re not falling for this slander, we’re taking back the republic, whether you statists like it or not!